The Xeon E5-1620 v4 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
The Core i9-13900F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-13900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i9-13900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
83%
Min 1% FPS
120
85%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
216
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, CA$
CA$564.17
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.61/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i9-13900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
10 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
68%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$294.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
140 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |