Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 207 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$639.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$639.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7730 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |