In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 5 5600GT. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v2
No clear advantages
Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Up to 51% faster in Battlefield 6 – 95 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 51% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Ryzen 5 5600GT: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
95 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
71 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Ryzen 5 5600GT in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Ryzen 5 5600GT in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
10 MB
62%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 5600GT Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $140.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM4 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
