Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3504 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 221% better in Immortals of Aveum than Xeon E3-1260L - 77 vs 24 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 32 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
77
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |