Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 4019 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 19% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E3-1260L - 234 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 16 vs 8 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 7 5700
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
