Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4580 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 19% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E3-1260L - 138 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 32 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i9-14900K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
