Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2535 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1240 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 80 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 138 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Core i7-13700K
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v5 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
