Buy on Amazon
CA$179.98
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP $273
Availability
MSRP $273
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $140
Availability
MSRP $140
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 3872 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 16% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 142 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
142
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$179.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT 6-Core, 24-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for CA$179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 5 5600GT
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
PCs Using Xeon E3-1240 v3 or Ryzen 5 5600GT
With selected game settings
40 FPS
CA$47.54/FPS
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,901.75
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
