Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E3-1230 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 4304 days newer than Xeon E3-1230.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 13% better in Dead Space than Xeon E3-1230 - 164 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1230 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1230 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
164
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$279
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6761 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1230 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |