Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3017 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1225
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 41% better in War Thunder than Xeon E3-1225 - 191 vs 135 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 12 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |