Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2356G outperforms Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2356G is 794 days newer than Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Xeon E-2356G
- Performs up to 3% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 5 3600 - 267 vs 259 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2356G - 65 vs 80 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
259
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2356G | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics P750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |