Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E-2334 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 307 days older than Xeon E-2334.
Advantages of Xeon E-2334
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Sons Of The Forest than Xeon E-2334 - 109 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2334 - 24 vs 8 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
109
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$377
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$377 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7103 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2334 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |