Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1316 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Xeon E-2276M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E-2276M - 243 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 16 vs 12 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
243
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2276M | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |