Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E-2224 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 39 days newer than Xeon E-2224.
Advantages of Xeon E-2224
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E-2224 - 135 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2224 - 65 vs 71 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2224 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E-2224 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
71 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |