In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is faster than the Core i7-6950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Up to 20% faster in Battlefield 6 – 95 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer – Jul 14, 2020 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 4 years and 1 month newer
Core i7-6950X
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 140 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Core i7-6950X: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Jul 14th, 2020
Average FPS
95 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
71 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Core i7-6950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1681
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
15174
100%
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Core i7-6950X in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Jul 14th, 2020
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-6950X
May 31st, 2016
Cores
10-core
31%
L3 Cache
25 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Jul 14th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6950X May 31st, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 14th, 2020 | Released | May 31st, 2016 |
| $2,749.00 | MSRP | $1,723.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| WRX8 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
| 280 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
