Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1136 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 94 vs 81 FPS
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$270.10 vs CA$2200.00
- Up to 89% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$2.87 vs CA$27.16 per FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
81
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$27.16/FPS
11%
Price, CA$
CA$2200
12%
Buy for CA$2,200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
94
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |