Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1136 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 48 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 73 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$270.10 vs CA$1115.00
- Up to 79% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$3.70 vs CA$17.98 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
62
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$17.98/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$1115
24%
Buy for CA$1,115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 288 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
73
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 287 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
48 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |