Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1547 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 258 vs 239 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$399.17 vs CA$619.46
- Up to 40% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$1.55 vs CA$2.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
239
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.59/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$619.46
64%
Buy for CA$619.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7456 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$399.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$399.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7730 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |