Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1457 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700KF.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 35% better in Starfield than Core i7-9700KF - 84 vs 62 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-9700KF
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$514.96 vs CA$929.00
- Up to 25% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$8.31 vs CA$11.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
84
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.06/FPS
75%
Price, CA$
CA$929
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
62
74%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$514.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$514.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raphael | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |