Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 1183 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900X - 218 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$589.90 vs CA$850.00
- Up to 39% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900X - CA$2.71 vs CA$4.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$589.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$589.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 537 minutes ago
Buy for CA$850 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 533 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7900 | vs | Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Raphael | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |