In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 6900HX is slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 27, 2022
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Jan 27th, 2022
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
16 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
84%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
86%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HX Jan 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP7 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Radeon 680M | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
