In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 9 6900HX is quite a bit faster than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6 – 97 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 5 days newer – Jan 13, 2022 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 3 years and 5 days newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
76 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
78%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 9 6900HX vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Jan 13th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
9 MB
56%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
84%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 9 6900HX Jan 13th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 13th, 2022 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| FP7 | Socket | LGA1151 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Radeon 680M | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
