Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 243 days newer than Ryzen 9 4900HS.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 4900HS - 146 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 24 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$377
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$377 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7382 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Renoir | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |