In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 7 1700X is slower than the Ryzen 9 3900XT. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $194 cheaper!
Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 50% cheaper – $195.99 vs $389.99
- Up to 50% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.72 vs $4.33/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 95 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 10% less energy
Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jul 07, 2020 vs Mar 02, 2017
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 9 3900XT: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
72 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
79%
Price, $
$195.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.72/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Average FPS
90 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
68 FPS
100%
Price, $
$389.99
50%
Value, $/FPS
$4.33/FPS
63%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 9 3900XT in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 9 3900XT in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 1700X
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
16 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Jul 7th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 7 1700X Mar 2nd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 3900XT Jul 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 2nd, 2017 | Released | Jul 7th, 2020 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | AM4 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
