Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 897 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$266.24 vs CA$1099.99
- Up to 70% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$2.42 vs CA$8.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 135 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 32 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
110
81%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$266.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$266.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.15/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$1099.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Renoir | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |