Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$393.92 vs CA$494.81
- Up to 14% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i9-11900K - CA$2.49 vs CA$2.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Halo Infinite than Ryzen 5 1600X - 171 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
158
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$393.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$393.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 284 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.89/FPS
86%
Price, CA$
CA$494.81
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$494.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 397 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |