Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2463 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$100.00 vs CA$419.00
- Up to 72% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-14700F - CA$0.85 vs CA$3.06 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 1600 - 137 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 28 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
118
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.06/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$419
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$419 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |