Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 750 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 15 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 327 vs 300 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 8 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
327
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |