The Ryzen 3 3200G is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-4300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-4300
The Ryzen 3 3200G is better in every way
Ryzen 3 3200G vs FX-4300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, CA$
CA$141.38
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
93%
Min 1% FPS
112
94%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 3 3200G vs FX-4300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3200G vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
