Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 912 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - CA$120.68 vs CA$766.29
- Up to 82% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-12900F - CA$0.61 vs CA$3.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 3200G - 223 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
199
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$120.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1876 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
223
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.44/FPS
18%
Price, CA$
CA$766.29
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$766.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2149 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |