The Ryzen 3 3100 is a much faster gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-1620 v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3100
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
The Ryzen 3 3100 is better in every way
Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, CA$
CA$140
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
96%
Min 1% FPS
120
97%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3100 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
62%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
97%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
$99.00 | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
| Matisse | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
65 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
