In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 3 1200 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2699A v4 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $999 cheaper!
Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 6% faster in Battlefield 6 – 67 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 months and 1 day newer – Jul 27, 2017 vs Oct 25, 2016
- Is 9 months and 1 day newer
- Up to 93% cheaper – $79.98 vs $1078.93
- Up to 93% cheaper
- Up to 93% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.19 vs $17.12/FPS
- Up to 93% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 65 vs 145 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Xeon E5-2699A v4
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 3 1200
Jul 27th, 2017
Average FPS
67 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
63 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
94%
Price, $
$1078.93
7%
Value, $/FPS
$17.12/FPS
7%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 1200 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 1200
Jul 27th, 2017
Cores
4-core
18%
L3 Cache
8 MB
15%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 3 1200 Jul 27th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 Oct 25th, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 27th, 2017 | Released | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$109.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
