In Battlefield 6, the Ryzen 3 1200 is slightly slower than the Core i3-10105F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $29 cheaper!
Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 27% cheaper – $79.98 vs $109.00
- Up to 27% cheaper
- Up to 15% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.21 vs $1.43/FPS
- Up to 15% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 15% faster in Battlefield 6 – 76 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jul 27, 2017
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Ryzen 3 1200 vs Core i3-10105F: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 3 1200
Jul 27th, 2017
Average FPS
66 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
49 FPS
86%
Price, $
$79.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$109
73%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
85%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 1200 vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 1200 vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 1200
Jul 27th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Ryzen 3 1200 Jul 27th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $109.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM4 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
