Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 5355 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 24% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom II X4 925 - 140 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$349
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7296 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Deneb | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |