Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3709 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 45% better in Starfield than Phenom II X4 925 - 61 vs 42 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Deneb | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |