In Battlefield 6, the Pentium G3220 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $277 cheaper!
Pentium G3220
- Up to 95% cheaper – $15.45 vs $291.95
- Up to 95% cheaper
- Up to 90% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.25 vs $2.43/FPS
- Up to 90% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 97% faster in Battlefield 6 – 120 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 97% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Pentium G3220 vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Pentium G3220
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
61 FPS
51%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
51%
Price, $
$15.45
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
120 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$291.95
5%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
10%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Pentium G3220 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Pentium G3220 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Pentium G3220
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Pentium G3220 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
