Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon X5677 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 3139 days newer than Xeon X5677.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Xeon X5677 - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon X5677 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5677 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5677 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$507.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$507.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5677 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |