Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon X5670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3786 days newer than Xeon X5670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5670
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Xeon X5670 - 545 vs 505 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5670 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5670 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
545
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$425
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5670 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |