Key Differences
In short — Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core Ultra 9 185H is 5021 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon X5650 - 240 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 22 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core Ultra 9 185H
Mobile • Dec 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ultra 9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | METEOR LAKE |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 2049 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 22 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 128EU |
| No | Overclockable | No |
