Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600 is 4677 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600
- Performs up to 27% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon X5650 - 199 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i5-13600
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
449
18.424292162494872%
Multi-Core
2222
17.89049919484702%
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 14 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
