Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 3541 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 95 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 23% better in New World than Xeon X5650 - 121 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 48 vs 12 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$13.8/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1670
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,670 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |