Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2956 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5650 - 126 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 16 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
126
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$158.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$158.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60098 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Single-Core
449
40.305206463195695%
Multi-Core
2222
40.480961923847694%
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |