Buy on Amazon
CA$112
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3690 outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3690 is 260 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3690
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-875K - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Core I7-875K I7 875K I7 875 2.933 GHz Used Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65401 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon W3690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
509
90.40852575488455%
Multi-Core
1761
66.30271084337349%
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Gulftown | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.