Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2425 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 9% better in Remnant II than Xeon W3690 - 86 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
86
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$93.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$93.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Gulftown | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |