Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 2939 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon W3680 - 160 vs 146 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |