Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 4447 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Xeon W3565 - 286 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon W3565
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
