Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2839 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 35% better in F1 23 than Xeon W3565 - 202 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3565 - 32 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |