Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 1726 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 0% better in Lost Ark than Xeon W3550 - 225 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
225
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 53 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |