Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3766 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 5% better in Metro Exodus than Xeon W3530 - 146 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3530 - 24 vs 8 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$728.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$728.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |