Key Differences
In short — Xeon w3-2435 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w3-2435 is 3082 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w3-2435
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 137 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon w3-2435
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
926
53.93127548048923%
Multi-Core
3996
44.008810572687224%
Intel Xeon w3-2435 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 85 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
